??? 01/08/08 15:02 Read: times |
#149142 - Actually... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Christoph Franck said:
while( (((int) TH1)<<8) + int(TL1) )<Delay); should be "correct", but that still does not solve the atomicity issue. Actually, assuming that we are talking about C, the second cast is not a valid C-style cast. Casting in the way shown in the second cast is a functional cast which is only valid in C++, the first cast is a correct C-style cast. I'm not sure if the second cast is necessary one way or another. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Number of CPU cycle for 8051 function call | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Do it in assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Delay functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A related trick | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Offset | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Offset | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Over Drive? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a refinement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NOPs are so bad waste of space... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
waste of space... waste of time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
fixed delay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Variable delay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
determinism of the cache | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
there are no cache misses in 'linear code' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I got only ONE cache miss... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Old Keil Thread | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What about a Delay like this. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No, it won't. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ok. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
also | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Also ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actually... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
will. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ANSI C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil option: Disable ANSI casts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
typo. | 01/01/70 00:00 |