Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/15/12 16:06
Read: times


 
#188828 - I'm not sure I agree ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
The ability to simulate the effects of a specific configuration, i.e. SFR content is, I believe, quite critical to a specific MCU implementation. I, for one, like the way in which the Maxim/Dallas 89C4x0's ise tje dual data pointers, with their optional auto-increment/decrement feature.

These MCU's, after all, are just hardware, and if the hardware works differently, a simulator has to reflect the differences accurately. It has to "know" the inner workings of the serial ports, among other features, so that it reflects the interrupt latency correctly. It should, though this one apparently doesn't at the moment, provide accurate oscillator and system clock cycle count, and, ideally, would do so in the context of the various addressing modes in which those DS89C4x0's can operate.

I'm not so sure that those different features are impossible to simulate. After all, the assembler deals with the different features in order to redefine the table of valid SFR's. The same set of SFR definitions can provide a framework for the simulator. Naturally, as the number of available configurations in each MCU increases, the size of that table increases as well.

RE

List of 32 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Turbo51 Studio            01/01/70 00:00      
   any examples ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Examples ready for download            01/01/70 00:00      
         Great            01/01/70 00:00      
         Cycle Counter ?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Coming soon            01/01/70 00:00      
      hardly            01/01/70 00:00      
         again in English ?            01/01/70 00:00      
            It's pretty apparent ...             01/01/70 00:00      
            What's in a name.            01/01/70 00:00      
         Read all pages            01/01/70 00:00      
         Tired of hearing it again and again.            01/01/70 00:00      
            how can you ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Perspective            01/01/70 00:00      
               Not only atmel support            01/01/70 00:00      
                  The Simulator would be the most interesting ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Everything is possible            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I'm not sure I agree ...             01/01/70 00:00      
                           As I said...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              plugins?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Not yet            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Different levels of Simulation             01/01/70 00:00      
               Extended Disdain            01/01/70 00:00      
                  corporate culture            01/01/70 00:00      
                     why didn't you sue them?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        In the US system ....            01/01/70 00:00      
                           re:suing            01/01/70 00:00      
                              ... and then there's "Small Claims Court"            01/01/70 00:00      
   New version has been released            01/01/70 00:00      
      Neat work.            01/01/70 00:00      
      Does it support the basic architecture?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Core versions            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List