| ??? 08/27/11 12:16 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#183502 - where is bottleneck? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Praveen,
Your post is too long. Can You explain shortly what ideas are behind two methods? For me When the master wants to send a data protocol to a particular slave, it first addresses the slave, and if it responds back, it sends the protocol in the following pattern is inadequate. Master sends data, slave answers if message is received and understood. At least 1 packet less. regards |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Multiprocessor Communication 8052 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| where is bottleneck? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's the usual approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 9th Bit - How ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how to use bit 9 for data bytes? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one form of 9th bit use | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One byte | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One Byte !!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: 1 byte - MDB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Strong work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just as there is a timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Protocol should preferably support dry-counting for EOP pos | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Methods in brief | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| At least 1 packet less (sic) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Neither! | 01/01/70 00:00 |