??? 08/07/07 08:16 Read: times |
#142853 - I hate this nomenclature Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I hate the DTE-DCE nomenclature - who on the earth can remember this?
Andy Neil said:
Anything that isn't a DCE (modem) should be a DTE - thus your PC and your 8051 should both be DTEs and, therefore, a so-called Null-modem cable should be needed to connect them. Andy, while the first line of your assertion is correct, you don't have enough information for your assertion "your 8051 should be a DTE" - how do you know it is not to be a controller of a modem-like equipment? Besides, regardless of what the standards say, it is much more convenient to have the '51-board with DCE-like connector, so that for quick testing and so, a simple snap-on connectors and a piece of flat cable can be used, or sometimes even the '51-gadget could be connected directly to the PC's COMM connector. Also, regardless of what the standards say, the RS232 is today more used for anything else than PC-to-modem connection. So, I'd not stick to this scheme too rigidly. For example, the most widespread RS-232-connected equipment without any doubt was (at least in certain period) the serial mouse. Would you call THAT a DTE or a DCE? :-) Don't get me wrong - it's good to know about the standard, and be aware of the 2 "pinouts" depending on the equipment; but, in this context, I'd not insist on following the standard literally. JW |
Topic | Author | Date |
interfacing with serial port of the PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this is why we have FAQs here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Three pins required | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
are you sure that site is alive? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well, slightly different | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Jan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oh-er-that's all right it's a pleasure... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Superman says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
English | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Only French and German? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Transmit and Receive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I hate this nomenclature | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Googled CP3102... | 01/01/70 00:00 |