| ??? 04/14/17 13:39 Read: times |
#190778 - the '51 faster than cortex @ floating point Responding to: ???'s previous message |
the '51 faster than cortex @ floating point
what a surprise the '51 uses far less memory than cortex @ floating point not a surprise, this is the thing always forgotten when comparing ARM and '51 http://community.silabs.com/t5/32-bit...63#U194663 yes, the '51 is clocked faster than the ARM in the above, but the rumor about how miserable the '51 is in comparison is blatantly false. again it is an application issue I have used the ARM in 4 of my last 5 projects |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Irony - NXP now back into 8-bit! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Motorola ain't Philips... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh, the Irony | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| male cow manure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the '51 faster than cortex @ floating point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Let's be specific about "Cortex" (sic) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fish | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just to show the fact that .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| or the fact that ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 |